|
|
This paper on a successful ,
non-traditional event held at Nortel in Ottawa for some grade 10 female
students. The paper was presented at the Eleventh Canadian Conference on
Engineering Education. The conference was held between Sunday July 5, 1998 and
Tuesday July 7, 1998 at Dalhousie University.
Pinocchio's Nose, the Long and Short of it: A
Special Day for Grade 10 Female Students at Nortel
Monique Frize, P. Eng., O.C.
NSERC/Nortel Joint Chair on Women in Science and Engineering,
Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University
and School of Information technology and Engineering, University of
Ottawa
Robert Long
Education-Interaction, Nortel, Ottawa, ON
Scott Moore
Head, Guidance Counseling, Sir Robert Borden High School
Graham Satterthwaite
Dept. Head, Science, and science teacher, SRB High School
Abstract
Eighty-nine grade ten female students from Sir
Robert Borden High School attended a special event at Nortel in February 1998.
They were involved in a hands-on building project (a Pinocchio nose), heard a
presentation on career choices, played a game by crossing a radio-active swamp
and visited Nortel laboratories. A survey of the impact of the event on the
students revealed that this was a very successful program. A majority of them
felt that they now knew a lot more about science and engineering, will sign up
in science courses in grade 11, and 40 percent said it had an impact on their
choice of a career. The school confirmed that 89 percent of those who attended
the event actually signed-up for advanced level science courses. The event will
now be offered to one hundred female students from rural areas in Western Quebec
and Eastern Ontario in the fall.
1. Introduction
A research endeavour looking at whether science
promotion programs make a difference (Vickers et al., 1995) reported that the
impact varied not only by program, but also by gender. Results of that study
indicated that the strongest positive impact on girls came from a single-sex
program called GIRLS IN SCIENCE. Many of the mixed gender programs to promote
science had a stronger impact on boys than on girls. Of the almost 1600 students
surveyed in that British Columbia study, 44 % of the young women indicated that
Medicine was their career choice, versus 26 % of the young men. In the same
survey, 4 % of the women versus 20 % of the men chose Engineering as a
profession. Another study (Frize, 1998) reports that the impact of a science and
engineering summer camp for young students in grades 5-8 was highly successful
for both genders. That program was designed in such a way to attract an equal
number of girls and boys, and the activities were designed with both groups in
mind.
These studies lead the authors to design a
particular event in the Ottawa/Carleton region for grade ten female students. A
post-event evaluation was done and the results are reported here. For a few
years, Nortel had sponsored a yearly event, with the help of teachers and
guidance counselors of Sir Robert Borden School, consisting mainly of
job-shadowing activities with groups of two to three students accompanied by a
woman scientist or engineer at Nortel. In 1997, both the Nortel staff and the
students felt somewhat disappointed with the results. At this point, the authors
of this paper and an engineering student from the University of Ottawa, Shanta
Ramshandani, met to revisit how the half-day with the students should be spent.
2. The New Design of the Event
Discussions on what could lead to a more
successful formula resulted in the following decisions: The students must feel
that they are in large peer groups (8 to 10) with only two role models
accompanying and guiding them. The author believed this would give the young
women a sense that it was overwhelmingly their day, and they would find several
peers around them, instead of several adults. The second point was that the day
must consist of activities which were very different from each other and yet
would give a very complete experience to the students. The main factor was that
the activities must be fun and interesting. The half-day was organised
as follows:
Students arrived at Nortel by bus at around 9 am.
And after receiving their name badges, were ushered into an auditorium where
Monique Frize made a 20-minute keynote presentation on the exciting careers in
science and engineering and how to plan their career and their life. Some of the
key messages included: The excellent job market in certain fields, namely in
computer science and computer engineering, electrical engineering,
biotechnology, and some fields of chemistry and physics; the courses that must
be completed to be able to study in these fields; how to plan a career and the
importance of achieving economic independence; the importance of choosing their
spouse or partner as carefully as their career, and learning how to look at such
a relationship as a partnership, and not to take on a submissive role; finally,
the talk ended by giving tips for success.
At the end of the talk, each of the leaders (role
models) introduced herself to the students (name and role); five students had
volunteered from each of the universities (Ottawa and Carleton) and a similar
number represented Nortel as staff. A few students and working women were from
Algonquin College, and this provided a more complete picture of career
opportunities. What a wonderful sight it was to see all these role models in
front of the auditorium! The young students seemed to be very impressed!
The colour dots on the badges separated the
groups effectively and students were rotated through three main types of
activities: four groups were in the rotunda (a central large location at
Nortel's main facility) creating a Pinocchio nose. The rules were simple: the
nose had to stay horizontally on a real person's nose, and was to be created
from a pile of newspapers, tape, and one string 6 feet long. The imagination was
spectacular and the building process yielded noses that were between 15 and 18
feet in length. This activity was scheduled for a full hour.
During that time, two groups played a
'radioactive swamp' game, while the two other groups visited Nortel
laboratories. Then the groups swapped. Each of these activities was scheduled
for 30 minutes. The 'swamp crossing' game was a challenge where a whole team of
students had to overcome several obstacles and dangers and get to the other side
as successfully as possible.
The radioactive swamp required the team of
students to collaboratively overcome several obstacles to successfully transport
the entire team to safety. They never knew when the radioactive tsetse fly might
strike them mute or blind, or when the swamp monster might steal an unused
floating platform used for the transportation challenge. These four groups then
went to build the nose, while the groups who had just built the nose went to
labs and to the 'swamp crossing'.
The day ended with a 'pasta feast', and the
students returned to school for the afternoon period. A detailed questionnaire
was given to all grade 10 female students who had attended the event. The
results are discussed in the next section. Table 1 shows the schedule of the
rotation of the activities. There were approximately ten young women in each
group, with two women role models, a student and a working scientist or
engineer.
TABLE I: SCHEDULE OF ROTATION OF
ACTIVITIES
|
9:30 |
10:15 |
10:45 |
11:15 |
11:45 |
12:15 |
Groups 1 & 2 |
Introductions / Keynote |
Pinocchio Nose |
Pinocchio Nose |
Radio Active Swamp |
Tour of Facility |
Lunch |
Groups 3& 4 |
Introductions / Keynote |
Pinocchio Nose |
Pinocchio Nose |
Tour of Facility |
Radio-Active Swamp |
Lunch |
Groups 5& 6 |
Introductions / Keynote |
Radio- Active Swamp |
Tour of Facility |
Pinocchio Nose |
Pinocchio Nose |
Lunch |
Groups 7& 8 |
Introductions / Keynote |
Tour of Facility |
Radio- Active Swamp |
Pinocchio Nose |
Pinocchio Nose |
Lunch |
3. Results
Enjoyment of the activities
Of the 90 students who attended the event, 75
filled-in the questionnaire. On the question of how well the day was organised,
94.6 % of the students answered 'YES'. Another 4.1 % (3 students) said 'SORT
OF', and one student said 'NO'. When asked in general if they enjoyed the day,
86.7 % said 'YES, A LOT' and the remaining 13.3 % said 'SORT OF'. The results of
how interesting each activity was, separately, are shown in Table 2
below. The results of how much fun each activity was, again separately,
are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 2 HOW INTERESTING EACH
ACTIVITY WAS (%)
|
Presentation
on Career Choices |
Pinocchio Nose |
Swamp Test |
Visit to Labs |
Best |
18.7% |
41.3% |
52.0% |
16.0% |
Yes |
62.7% |
33.3% |
10.7% |
49.3% |
Sort of |
16.0% |
17.3% |
10.7% |
30.7% |
No |
1.3% |
8.0% |
1.3% |
4.0% |
TABLE 3 HOW MUCH FUN EACH
ACTIVITY WAS (%)
|
Keynote
on Career Choices |
Pinocchio
Nose |
River
Test |
Visit
to Labs |
Best |
10.7% |
46.7% |
66.7% |
9.3% |
Yes |
42..7 |
29.3% |
26.7% |
38.7% |
Sort of |
38.7% |
18.7% |
5.3% |
48.0% |
No |
8.0% |
5.3% |
1.4% |
4.0% |
Impact on Interest in these Topics,
Future Course Selection and Career Choice
The question was: Did this visit change any of
the following: your interest in science and engineering careers, your knowledge
about opportunities in these fields, the courses you will choose in high school,
and your own career choice. The students could answer 'YES' or 'NO' to each of
the four parts of the question. Results are shown in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4 IMPACT ON CAREER AND COURSE
CHOICES (%)
|
Interest in
Science and Engineering |
Knowledge on
opportunities in these fields |
Course to be
chosen in high school |
Career Choices |
YES |
59.5% |
88.0% |
39.2% |
46.6% |
NO |
40.5% |
12.0% |
60.8% |
53.4% |
The results were very encouraging. Just over 60 %
of the students indicated that the visit changed their interest in science and
engineering careers; 88 % said that the visit changed their knowledge about such
careers; 46.6 % indicated the visit will have an impact on their career choice;
and 39.2 % said that the visit would change the courses they would take next
year. On this last point, the school has actually confirmed that 80 percent of
these young women have signed-up for advanced level science courses for their
grade 11 classes, which represents a figure which is 50 percent higher than the
indications in the questionnaire. Fifteen percent chose no science courses and
the rest chose general level science courses.
On whether this activity should be repeated next
year for a new group of grade 10 students, an overwhelming 90.7 % said 'YES'
with 8% saying 'SORT OF'. Only one student said 'NO'.
In addition, because young women often feel it is
important to attend special events with one or more friends, and that they
should enjoy the group they are with, a few questions were added along these
lines. It was surprising to find that 70 students (93.3 %) said that they had
come with a friend. This visit is organised on a voluntary basis; students have
to sign up for it and get their parents' or guardians' permission to attend.
Moreover, 71 (or 94.7 %) said that they enjoyed the group they were with. The
groups had been formed by the teachers on a random basis.
Special Comments from the Students on the Impact of the Day
-- I learned how many engineering fields there are and how interesting the
variety of fields are.
-- I realized how many job opportunities there are in the science field and how
much travel is involved.
-- I see technology a lot differently now than before the visit.
-- I realized that everything involving science and engineering was not as
boring as I thought it was before.
-- I thought technology was only about computer things, the boring stuff, but I
now realize that there are a lot of things concerning technology and engineering
that are interesting.
-- The opportunities were not just engineering and computers, there were
scientists, medicine.
-- I didn't know there were so many choices. I know what courses to take, to get
into the field of engineering.
-- I thought computers and engineering jobs were only desk jobs, but the visit
to Nortel made them look more interesting.
-- At first I thought science would be an extremely boring field to work in, now
I think it may be interesting. I was planning on ditching sciences, but now I
believe that the knowledge I could gain in a science course may help me to
obtain a better paying, more interesting job.
-- After our visit to Nortel I realized that there are many different aspects to
technology. I am going to take physics next year, as well as grade 11 math. I
now see that engineering is a field that I would like to pursue for my career.
-- It made me aware that the world was moving into a world of technology and
that it would be necessary to have science and math skills to succeed in the
future.
-- I never really enjoyed working with computers that much, but this event has
shown me that not all computer jobs are boring. -- I never knew that you could
do Medical Engineering which I thought was very cool.
-- I realized that I may want to pursue Aerospace Engineering rather than
Biology.
4. Discussion
It is evident from the results reported in the
section above that the special half-day was highly successful, not only in
involving the students in successful hands-on engineering and science
activities, but in the degree of their enjoyment and interest in these
activities. The four different types of activities offered a wide variety of
information, fun, developing skills, and the students' confidence in getting
involved in science and engineering. From the comments heard during the lunch
and some of those reported above, the organisers feel that the formula has
worked. Having a single-sex event, with a mixture of activities (a hands-on
project, a game, lab visits, and a career guidance presentation) produced
results that surpassed any expectations.
The author is now planning to repeat this exact experience with 100 female
students from rural schools within 1.5 hours of Ottawa/Carleton. One or two
students from each class in grades 10, 11 and 12 will be invited to attend.
Their responsibility at the end of the day will be to share the experience with
their class when they return. This will provide a wide exposure of both young
women and young men in rural high school to careers in science and engineering.
There is no doubt that the experience should also be repeated with many schools
in the city area, and with other industrial sponsors. Nortel provided leadership
in this event and many other companies could gain much visibility by hosting
such events.
5. Conclusion
Much financial investment is made into science
and engineering promotion programs and few have been assessed for impact. This
study will hopefully stimulate many programs to assess how they are doing with
respect to having a positive impact on each gender, with a special attention
placed on how the participation of women in these fields can be increased
substantially, especially in fields where the job market is excellent. In
particular, designing an activity for females only, until such a time as
obstacles and stereotypes disappear from our society, and insuring a mix of
activities (a hands-on component, career choice guidance, visiting people
actually doing engineering and science, a game) ending with a social activity
such as a lunch with role models, was a recipe for outstanding success. The
formula will be refined slightly to alternate the types of hands-on activities
and games for new groups of students in the years to come. The long-term impact
on career choice will be measured when these students graduate from high school.
References
Frize, M. "Impact of a Gender-Balanced
Summer Engineering and Science Camp on Students' Future Course and Career
Choices." To appear in Proceedings of WEPAN Conference, Seattle, June 1998.
Vickers, M. , Ching, H.L., and Dean, C.B. "Do Science Promotion Programs
Make a Difference?" Proceedings (Papers and Initiatives), More than Just
Numbers Conference, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., E3B 5A3.
Aknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the
wonderful enthusiasm and dedication of the volunteers. Women scientists,
engineers, and technologists working at Nortel were: Bonnie Stuart Anderson,
Christine Bennett, Cecile Dreze, Joelle Guenette, Rebecca Lantz, Michele Low,
Karen Meyer, Holly Pearce, Julie Richards, and Helen Wong. The students from the
University of Ottawa were: Colleen Ennett, Anik Lacer
|